Another of my papers from an old project final came out in final form after a very long road. Here are some details.
Title: "Topological Data Analysis of Task-Based fMRI Data from Experiments on Schizophrenia"
Authors: Bernadette J. Stolz, Tegan Emerson, Satu Nahkuri, Mason A. Porter, and Heather A Harrington
Abstract: We use methods from computational algebraic topology to study functional brain networks in which nodes represent brain regions and weighted edges encode the similarity of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time series from each region. With these tools, which allow one to characterize topological invariants such as loops in high-dimensional data, we are able to gain understanding of low-dimensional structures in networks in a way that complements traditional approaches that are based on pairwise interactions. In the present paper, we use persistent homology to analyze networks that we construct from task-based fMRI data from schizophrenia patients, healthy controls, and healthy siblings of schizophrenia patients. We thereby explore the persistence of topological structures such as loops at different scales in these networks. We use persistence landscapes and persistence images to represent the output of our persistent-homology calculations, and we study the persistence landscapes and persistence images using k-means clustering and community detection. Based on our analysis of persistence landscapes, we find that the members of the sibling cohort have topological features (specifically, their one-dimensional loops) that are distinct from the other two cohorts. From the persistence images, we are able to distinguish all three subject groups and to determine the brain regions in the loops (with four or more edges) that allow us to make these distinctions.
My name is Mason Porter. I am a Professor in the Department of Mathematics at UCLA. Previously I was Professor of Nonlinear and Complex Systems in the Mathematical Institute at University of Oxford. I was also a Tutorial Fellow of Somerville College.
Thursday, May 20, 2021
Tuesday, May 18, 2021
"Counterparty Credit Limits: The Impact of a Risk-Mitigation Measure on Everyday Trading"
A paper of mine (from an extremely old project) final came out in final form today. Here are some details.
Title: Counterparty Credit Limits: The Impact of a Risk-Mitigation Measure on Everyday Trading
Authors: Martin D. Gould, Nikolaus Hautsch, Sam D. Howison, and Mason A. Porter
Abstract: A counterparty credit limit (CCL) is a limit that is imposed by a financial institution to cap its maximum possible exposure to a specified counterparty. CCLs help institutions to mitigate counterparty credit risk via selective diversification of their exposures. In this paper, we analyse how CCLs impact the prices that institutions pay for their trades during everyday trading. We study a high-quality data set from a large electronic trading platform in the foreign exchange spot market that allows institutions to apply CCLs. We find empirically that CCLs had little impact on the vast majority of trades in this data set. We also study the impact of CCLs using a new model of trading. By simulating our model with different underlying CCL networks, we highlight that CCLs can have a major impact in some situations.
Title: Counterparty Credit Limits: The Impact of a Risk-Mitigation Measure on Everyday Trading
Authors: Martin D. Gould, Nikolaus Hautsch, Sam D. Howison, and Mason A. Porter
Abstract: A counterparty credit limit (CCL) is a limit that is imposed by a financial institution to cap its maximum possible exposure to a specified counterparty. CCLs help institutions to mitigate counterparty credit risk via selective diversification of their exposures. In this paper, we analyse how CCLs impact the prices that institutions pay for their trades during everyday trading. We study a high-quality data set from a large electronic trading platform in the foreign exchange spot market that allows institutions to apply CCLs. We find empirically that CCLs had little impact on the vast majority of trades in this data set. We also study the impact of CCLs using a new model of trading. By simulating our model with different underlying CCL networks, we highlight that CCLs can have a major impact in some situations.
Friday, May 07, 2021
"Random-Graph Models and Characterization of Granular Networks"
A paper of mine from 2020 now has its final coordinates listed on the published file itself. Here are some details.
Title: Random-Graph Models and Characterization of Granular Networks
Authors: Silvia Nauer, Lucas Böttcher, and Mason A. Porter
Abstract: Various approaches and measures from network analysis have been applied to granular and particulate networks to gain insights into their structural, transport, failure-propagation and other systems-level properties. In this article, we examine a variety of common network measures and study their ability to characterize various two-dimensional and three-dimensional spatial random-graph models and empirical two-dimensional granular networks. We identify network measures that are able to distinguish between physically plausible and unphysical spatial network models. Our results also suggest that there are significant differences in the distributions of certain network measures in two and three dimensions, hinting at important differences that we also expect to arise in experimental granular networks.
Title: Random-Graph Models and Characterization of Granular Networks
Authors: Silvia Nauer, Lucas Böttcher, and Mason A. Porter
Abstract: Various approaches and measures from network analysis have been applied to granular and particulate networks to gain insights into their structural, transport, failure-propagation and other systems-level properties. In this article, we examine a variety of common network measures and study their ability to characterize various two-dimensional and three-dimensional spatial random-graph models and empirical two-dimensional granular networks. We identify network measures that are able to distinguish between physically plausible and unphysical spatial network models. Our results also suggest that there are significant differences in the distributions of certain network measures in two and three dimensions, hinting at important differences that we also expect to arise in experimental granular networks.