Message in the Sky: the arXiv debate

The following paper, which responds to a previous abstract I mocked mildly, was just posted on the arXiv:

Title: The Real Message in the Sky
Authors: Douglas Scott and J.P. Zibin
Comments: Response to physics/0510102, 2 pages
Subj-class: Popular Physics
\ A recent paper by Hsu & Zee (physics/0510102) suggests that if a Creator
wanted to leave a message for us, and she wanted it to be decipherable to all
sentient beings, then she would place it on the most cosmic of all billboards,
the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) sky. Here we point out that the spherical
harmonic coefficients of the observed CMB anisotropies (or their squared
amplitudes at each multipole) depend on the location of the observer, in both
space and time. The amount of observer-independent information available in the
CMB is a small fraction of the total that any observer can measure. Hence a
lengthy message on the CMB sky is fundamentally no less observer-specific than
a communication hidden in this morning's tea-leaves. Nevertheless, the CMB sky
does encode a wealth of information about the structure of the cosmos and
possibly about the nature of physics at the highest energy levels. The Universe
has left us a message all on its own.
\\ ( http://arXiv.org/abs/physics/0511135 , 5kb)


My entry about the previous paper in this series is here. I love the sarcastic comment in the current abstract about the tea leaves, but since the Gazebo has already given us the most likely solution to what the message is (with a nod to Douglas Adams, of course), I'm not sure how many more papers there will be on the subject.

A worrisome note is that the writers of that first article are very good, respected physicists. Does this mean we'll be seeing ID papers in PRL soon? Of course, we do already see self-organized criticality (SOC) papers in there, so maybe this wouldn't actually degrade PRL all that much... (Note: I am being slightly facetious about SOC. It does have some uses and gives some interesting thought experiments and toy calculations and even toy models, but some of its proponents do think it's worth far more than it is. Predrag Cvitanovic always has funny things to say about SOC; he calls it "self-organized triviality" even when [especially when, actually] its creators are in the same room.)