Here's an abstract of a paper that just got posted on the arXiv:
\Paper: physics/0602051
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 15:02:44 GMT (15kb)
Title: A Tempt To Measure Reality
Authors: Bhag C. Chauhan
Comments: 17 pages, Submitted for Foundation of Physics
Subj-class: Popular Physics; Physics and Society
\ Despite the extraordinary successes the two great bastions of $20^{th}$ century science (Quantum Theory and General Relativity) are troubled with serious conceptual and mathematical difficulties. As a result, further growth of fundamental science is at stake. Is this the end of science? Optimistic answer is ``NOT''! In this work, it is argued that science must continue its cruise, but with anew strategy -- a thorough recourse into the grass-root level working of science is inevitable. In fact, our conventional scientific methods are based upon ordinary sense perception, which keeps the outer physical
universe as a separate entity, that is something quite independent of the observer. Basically, it is the observer -- the knower (human mind) -- which makes perception possible. It makes a person or scientist to recognize or refute the existence of an object or a phenomenon. It is also tempted to evince that working of human mind is epistemically scientific and can, in principle, be completely deciphered. It's inclusion in scientific theories, although tedious, can certainly spark a revolution in our understanding of nature and reality.
\\ ( http://arXiv.org/abs/physics/0602051 , 15kb)
%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And even if it isn't the end of science as we know it, it may well be the end of spell-checking as we know it...
That is truly a fine specimen of psychoceramics. I'm almost tempted to read the paper, except... 17 pages of that? I'd never make it past page 2.
ReplyDeleteI didn't make it past the abstract.
ReplyDeleteI'm just doing my duty of laughing at it publicly.
My favorite line:
ReplyDelete"Is this the end of science? Optimistic answer is ``NOT''!"