Would you believe that I am "not more than 2" standard deviations from the norm?

Here are my EQ (empathizer quotient) and SQ (systemizer quotient) scores:

Here are your EQ SQ results:


EQ: 24

SQ: 85

The important factor to consider is not your absolute score, but the difference between the two.
This indicates whether you have more natural ability as an Empathizer or a Systemizer. If your
scores are about the same for your EQ and SQ, then you have well balanced empathizing-systemizing
capabilities.

Take the EQ SQ tests

In conclusion, it seems that I am tactless and anal. Oh wait...

Here is Gazebo's discussion of the topic. At least I only seemed to end up two standard deviations from the norm according to this metric rather than the ten of which I was once accused (and which I constantly cite as a badge of honor). You know, I think I got a whole standard deviation closer to the norm just because I can't read maps or follow directions. (They seemed to ignore the fact that mathematicians tend to be anal about certain things but entirely sloppy about others and that these two things shouldn't be projected to quantities of an opposite sign on a single axis.)