Tales from the arXiv: Tongue-Twister Edition

Here's an abstract that just got posted to the arXiv. Check out the title...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\\
Paper: physics/0702069
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:02:00 GMT (8kb)

Title: Would Bohr be born if Bohm were born before Born?
Authors: H. Nikolic
Categories: physics.soc-ph physics.hist-ph
Comments: 7 pages
Subj-class: Physics and Society; History of Physics
\\
I discuss a hypothetical historical context in which a Bohm-like deterministic interpretation of the Schrodinger equation could have been proposed before the Born probabilistic interpretation and argue that in such a context the Copenhagen (Bohr) interpretation would probably have never achieved great popularity among physicists.
\\ ( http://arXiv.org/abs/physics/0702069 , 8kb)
%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-
%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%--%%


And, pray tell, just how does that keep the hot side hot and the cold side cold?