Don't tempt me.

I have a vague recollection of mocking this abstract when the first version of the paper was posted to the arXiv, but I'm going to make fun of it again now anyway.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\Paper: physics/0602051
replaced with revised version Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:11:40 GMT (16kb)

Title: A Tempt To Measure Reality
Authors: Bhag C. Chauhan
Comments: 17 pages, typos, Submitted for Foundation of Physics
Subj-class: Popular Physics; Physics and Society
\Despite the extraordinary successes the two great bastions of $20^{th}$ century science (Quantum Theory and General Relativity) are troubled with serious conceptual and mathematical difficulties. As a result, further growth of fundamental science is at stake. Is this the end of science? Optimistic answer is ``NOT''! In this work, it is argued that science must continue its cruise, but with anew strategy -- a thorough recourse into the grass-root level working of science is inevitable. In fact, our conventional scientific methods are based upon ordinary sense perception, which keeps the outer physical universe as a separate entity, that is something quite independent of the observer. Basically, it is the observer -- the knower (human mind) -- which makes perception possible. It makes a person or scientist to recognize or refute the existence of an object or a phenomenon. It is also tempted to evince that working of human mind is epistemically scientific and can, in principle, be completely deciphered. It's inclusion in scientific theories, although tedious, can certainly spark a revolution in our understanding of nature and reality.
\\ ( http://arXiv.org/abs/physics/0602051 , 16kb)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


OK, now how about making a tempt to use proper grammar?

(Additionally, there is a strange lack of all-caps words for such a crackpot piece.)