Fresh from the arXiv

I just saw the following paper:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\Paper: physics/0608228
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:55:15 GMT (122kb)

Title: Predicting Baseball Home Run Records Using Exponential Frequency Distributions
Authors: D. J. Kelley, J. R. Mureika, J. A. Phillips
Comments: 5 pp, LaTeX; 1 eps figure
Subj-class: Popular Physics
\ A new model, which uses the frequency of individuals' annual home run totals, is employed to predict future home run totals and records in Major League Baseball. Complete home run frequency data from 1903--2005 is analyzed, resulting in annual exponential distributions whose changes can be a used as a measure of progression in the sport and serve as a basis against which record-setting performances can be compared. We show that there is an 80% chance that Barry Bonds' current 73 home run record will be broken in the next 10 years, despite the longevity of previous records held by baseball legends Babe Ruth and Roger Marris.
\\ ( http://arXiv.org/abs/physics/0608228 , 122kb)
%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-%-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Here's my first question: Do they take 'roids into account?

(The article is very small and -- on a quick glance -- doesn't seem to offer much except for some simple curve fitting. Granted, I could be up for some hot, steamy curve fitting.)