Tales from the ArXiv

Here is the abstract of a paper that just got posted to the arXiv:

arXiv:0803.4058
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:11:02 GMT (20kb)

Title: Crime and punishment in scientific research
Authors: Mathieu Bouville
Categories: physics.soc-ph physics.hist-ph
Comments: 10 pages, 2 tables
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
\\
Arguments against scientific misconduct one finds in the literature generally
fail to support current policies on research fraud: they may not prove wrong
what is typically considered research misconduct and they tend to make wrong
things that are not usually seen as scientific fraud, in particular honest
errors. I argue that society cannot set a rule enjoining scientists to be
honest, so any such rule can only be internal to science. Therefore society
cannot legitimately enforce it. Moreover, until an argument is provided to
prove that lack of honesty is far worse than lack of technical competence,
intentional deceit should not be punished much more harshly than technical
errors.
Keywords: cheating; ethics; fabrication; falsification; integrity;
plagiarism; research fraud; scientific misconduct.
\\ ( http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.4058 , 20kb)


Let me repeat the abstract's last sentence: Moreover, until an argument is provided to
prove that lack of honesty is far worse than lack of technical competence,
intentional deceit should not be punished much more harshly than technical
errors.


Comment: That is just utter bullshit. I understand that technical incompetence can cause at least as much damage as dishonesty, but there shouldn't be "punishment" for honest mistakes! What kind of society does this guy want to live in? In my ideal world, there is a big difference in how people react to dishonesty versus honest mistakes. Sheesh...