Showing posts with label e-mail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label e-mail. Show all posts

Monday, November 14, 2016

Replying to All: Million-Person Edition

Well, this story puts my dark sense of humor on overdrive.

It's probably not a good idea to reply-all when there are more than one million recipients. At least we know why people are getting slow e-mail responses from NHS employees at the moment.

Sunday, March 06, 2016

Monday, October 15, 2012

Fastest E-Mailer in the West

I received an e-mail at "Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:00:53 +0100"

I responded at "Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:01:13 +0100" [20 seconds later]

31 seconds later, I received a reply of "No one should reply to emails that fast."

Monday, May 21, 2012

Famous Inboxes

In you you ever wondered what e-mail messages characters like Hamlet, R2D2, or Napoleon Bonaparte might receive, then the blog Famous Inboxes is for you.

This is pretty cool!

(Tip of the cap to Keith Fraser.)

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Another Classic

Another classic...

A person thought I had not answered his/her e-mail from a couple of weeks ago and e-mailed to remind me to answer the e-mail. This person seemed to have forgotten that I answered the e-mail on the day that it was sent. This has led to the following exchange.

Other Person: "Please excuse my chasing you up but please would you be kind enough to answer my email."

Me: "I already answered the e-mail below, and you already responded to my answer. Would you like me to forward to you the response you gave to my response?"

Sunday, October 23, 2011

At Least it was Honest

I just got a spam e-mail titled "Spam Application for Summer Internship". At least the person who sent this to me was honest.

(This was one of the usual e-mails that are mail-merged rather than an application meant specifically for me out of sincere interest. "Spam" was actually in the title of this e-mail---it was not flagged as such by my e-mail server.)

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Professorial E-Mail Signatures

The new PHD Comics strip concerns the semiotics of professorial e-mail signatures.

In general, I do sometimes wonder if particular signatures from friends or colleagues signify anything relative to other things I have seen them use. Obviously, one must consider the habits of the individual in each case.

I don't follow the pattern described in the comic strip at all. I either use my first name or I use nothing at all (I never use initials), and then of course there is a .signature file (which includes my first name) if I am sending something from my regular e-mail account. I never use something formal like "Regards," or "Sincerely," unless I am ballistically pissed off or upset at the recipient(s) of my message. If I use my last name or my formal title outside of what's already in the .signature file, then there is Hell to pay. I will sometimes write "Thanks," if my .signature file that has "Mason" in it is too far down from where I am typing (and hence I will actually be typing my name instead of using what is in the .sig file), and I only use that as a surrogate for writing "Thanks." or "Thanks!" when my name in the .sig file is immediately below. Hence, my putting "Thanks," in my signature usually doesn't indicate anything (though it admittedly can on occasion mean that I am mildly upset).

For my friends, I also mostly use my first name or nothing at all, though for specific extremely close friends I'll use "Love," as a sign of affection. (Sometimes I'll use "Take care," in specific circumstances as well, especially if it's a friend from whom I haven't heard in a while.)

(Tip of the cap to Mariano Beguerisse Díaz.)

Friday, November 06, 2009

Useful E-mail of the Day

I just received an e-mail at 2:22 pm called "FW: Seminar right now" about a seminar today that started at 2:15 pm. That's useful. Talk about an epic fail.

Saturday, June 13, 2009

Old-School Forward

This is the text of an old forwarded message that Ben Williamson sent to me on 10/30/98. I was thinking about it today for the first time in a while, so I decided to dig it out. Even after all these years, it still brings a smile to my face. Here goes:

A Man walks into a supermarket and buys:
1 bar of soap
1 toothbrush
1 tube toothpaste
1 loaf of bread
1 pint of milk
1 single serving cereal
1 single serving frozen dinner

The girl at the checkout looks at him and says "Single are you?"

The man replies very sarcastically "How did you guess?"

She replies "because you're fucking ugly"

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Recent Annoyances

In honor of George Carlin, here are a couple of things that piss me off:

1. Weekly seminar announcements in the form of .xls attachments with 5 pages (one for each day). This now appears to have been fixed. (I complained loudly that I wanted to receive this information in the main text of an e-mail.)

2. The following keeps happening over and over again with numerous different people: When I schedule a meeting involving N > 2 people and I cc the relevant people, I want the response to include them because their preferences/opinions are also necessary. Is 'reply to all' so hard? (I understand if somebody forgets on occasion, but why is this so widespread?)


Notice that (1) annoyed me immensely with just one occurrence, whereas (2) required multiple occurrences in quick succession to really get on my nerves.

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Over 900 e-mails in October...

I sent over 900 e-mails this month. (A decent number of them were pleasure e-mails.)

This isn't my record, but it is my most in a while. The other months that reached these epic proportions included enormous numbers of messages pertaining to the Legends of Caltech book that Autumn Looijen and I wrote. (Writing Legends + teaching courses + research = lots of e-mail. Now we can add College business to that particular equation.)

I really should be going to bed instead of writing this.

Saturday, June 16, 2007

Pleasure e-mails

This week has been a busy week.

I set up several SURF students, worked on finishing up a paper (which we should submit very soon -- maybe as early as Monday), did some numerical runs for the archival version of the dimer chain paper (currently in progress, with an estimated submission time of mid July), engaged in some media sluttage, and sent tons of e-mails.

Between dealing with all this stuff, I think I sent more than 40 e-mails on at least three different days. However, very few of them were so-called pleasure e-mails, which is a meme I accidently started at dinner a few months ago. This, by the way, is what this post is really about. ("This is a song about Alice.")

Anyway, my nice little slip of the tongue (ugh... that could be interpreted multiple ways) became a bit of a meme in our crowd. I guess that's just the way things work.

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

False Positives

As some of you know, my spam filters have had a couple critical failures with respect to false positives.

In the last 24 or so hours, I have gotten 4 false positives, which is a far more frequent pace than I got before, so I'm wondering if I will need to alert the IMSS folks at Caltech. (I could also set up extra filters, but I've only noticed one pattern so far, and it wouldn't help for the other cases, which are the more important ones.) These four e-mail messages are two PR e-mails from Caltech (and it amuses me that these got flagged), an application letter from a prospective SURF student, and an e-mail from Brian Limketkai '98 sending new contact information. (Obviously, I am extremely annoyed that the last of these showed up as spam, because missing that message would have royally sucked.)

Grrrrrrr....