Showing posts with label love. Show all posts
Showing posts with label love. Show all posts

Thursday, March 14, 2019

Emoji and \Latex: Bowser, Peach, Mario, and the Dynamics of Love



Update: I should have zoomed in more to show a higher-quality screenshot. Here is one, where you can see that the graphics are rather clear.

Saturday, August 02, 2014

Love, Three-Body Problems, and Chaos

Well, mathematicians certainly like to discuss love and its chaotic implications. (Remember, the three-body problem is provably chaotic.)

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

"This is the first serious modeling application in the field of love dynamics."

That is the first highlight listed for this paper, which is called A mathematical model of "Gone with the Wind".

(Tip of the cap to Jesús Cuevas Maraver.)

Monday, January 21, 2013

Tales from the ArXiv: Statistical Physicists Conclude that Love is Universal

Here is a new paper about love.

Title: A model about love in human dynamics

Authors: Bin Zhou, Shujia Qin, Xiao-Pu Han, Bing-Hong Wang

Abstract: Human-initiated systems are the most complex systems. From now on, many people have done lots of works which are mostly centralized in time and space aspect in human dynamics, but relative to the cognizance which we have known, there must be underlying mechanisms about human society behavior that have not yet been discovered. We should research human society behavior form more other aspect to get more deeply and externally truth. In this letter, we propose a love model from a completely new angle to explain the love question between males and females in human society behavior. First, we establish the dynamics mechanism about the love model and get the exact analytical result about our love model, we compare the simulative results with the analytical predictions and find they completely coincide with each other, therefore, the analytical results can absolutely express the rule of our love model. Second, in several different conditions, we get the approximative and compact results which almost agreement with the simulative results, hence, the approximative results is dependable. Finally, we collect the experimental date by the network and compare it with the simulative results, and we can find, when the model parameter is given a specifical value, that the experimental evidence corresponds with the simulative results. This explains the love question which is universal existent between the male and female in reality and indicate the correctness and practicality of our love model in a certain extent.

Saturday, February 11, 2012

The Thermodynamics of Love

This article is apparently about the thermodynamics of love. I have no further comments. :)

OK, I do have one more comment: In a sequel article, perhaps the author will ask whether sex is endothermic or exothermic.

(Tip of the cap to whoever does the Facebook posts for Physics Today.)

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Hopf Bifurcations in the Dynamics of Love

As discussed in this paper, beware of Hopf bifurcations in the dynamics of love! Who knew that a Hopf bifurcation could be so emotionally deadly?

Update: Does anybody agree with me that this would make a fabulous movie title?

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Tales from the ArXiv: Damping in Quantum Love Affairs

Sometimes, an eye-catching paper gets posted on the arXiv preprint server. Here is one such paper:

Title: Damping in Quantum Love Affairs

Author: Fabio Bagarello

Abstract: In a series of recent papers we have used an operatorial technique to describe stock markets and, in a different context, {\em love affairs} and their time evolutions. The strategy proposed so far does not allow any dumping effect. In this short note we show how, within the same framework, a strictly non periodic or quasi-periodic effect can be introduced in the model by describing in some details a linear Alice-Bob love relation with damping.



One of the things I really like about the title is that 'damping' can be used in both a physical and nonphysical context. Hell, it can be used in at least two different physical contexts! [Rarrrr!] And you know what makes it even more awesome? The fact that the abstract includes a typographical error in which "damping" is inadvertently called "dumping". D'oh!

I have only one question: Shouldn't the author have cited my article on quantum cuteness?