Meet me in the back alley at the stroke of midnight

Paper: cond-mat/0607659
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:27:26 GMT (109kb)

Title: Response to "Response to the Comment on 'Performance of a Spin Based Insulated Gate Field Effect Transistor' "
Authors: S. Bandyopadhyay and M. Cahay
Comments: This is a response to cond-mat/0607432. We had submitted a Comment on the original paper by Hall and Flatte to Applied Physics Letters which is currently still under review. Cond-mat/0607432 is apparently Hall and Flatte's response to our Comment. Here we show that the arguments in the response are flawed
Subj-class: Mesoscopic Systems and Quantum Hall Effect
\ We show that the arguments in the posting cond-mat/0607432 by Flatte and Hall are flawed and untenable. Their spin based transistor cannot work as claimed because of fundamental scientific barriers, which cannot be overcome now, or ever. Their device is not likely to work as a transistor at room temperature, let alone outperform the traditional MOSFET, as claimed.
\\ ( http://arXiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0607659 , 109kb)



I don't know about you, but I am eagerly awaiting for Response to 'Response to "Response to the Comment on 'Performance of a Spin Based Insulated Gate Field Effect Transistor' " ' to be posted.

Let the games begin!