Here is a paper that was recently revised:
Paper (*cross-listing*): quant-ph/0605021
replaced with revised version Wed, 8 Nov 2006 12:20:44 GMT (12kb)
Title: Monogamy inequality for distributed Gaussian entanglement
Authors: Tohya Hiroshima, Gerardo Adesso, and Fabrizio Illuminati
Comments: 4 pages, no figures. Several improvements, proof made more
transparent, conclusions enriched
Subj-class: Quantum Physics; Mathematical Physics; Statistical Mechanics;
Optics
\\ ( http://arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0605021 , 12kb)
First, I am rather curious what exactly constitutes "enriched" conclusions in a "monogamy inequality," especially when "distributed entanglement" is involved. Second, I totally dig the third author's last name. :)
In other news, I got an e-mail this evening indicating that I've already overspent my academic funds. This is bad news, because if this is accurate, I will need to pay for two conferences entirely on my own. D'oh! I wonder if I screwed up a calculation somewhere... I was thinking I would have to do one on my own and would have enough funds for almost all of the other one. Well, I can't get out of the earlier of these two, but I may end up having to bail on the second of these even though that is my most important conference. Damnit. Well, I just have to cross my fingers and hope that this is somebody else's error rather than mine... If I can't get Caltech to pay me this summer (my job expires in mid June, but I'll still be paying rent here for a while after that), I'm going to take a serious financial hit. I'll survive without a problem, but I will be losing a hefty sum from my bank account.
1 day ago
No comments:
Post a Comment